It is strange how the
media, pundits and politicians all discuss where the cuts should be,
and how deep and how fast we should cut. No debate on why the cuts,
no debate on why the banks were handed trillions of pounds of tax
payers money. There is never any debate on why the private debt of
the banking sector was transferred to the public's balance sheet.
There is never any debate on the fact that the present sovereign debt
crisis was created because of this shifting of the private debt
crisis in the banking sector, on to the public's balance sheet. Should
we not be shifting the debate to, how we can transfer those trillions
of pounds back from the banking sector into the public purse, and
should we debating how we should cut the banking sector down to size
to suit the needs of our society.
We're facing a crisis, you'll have to face austerity cuts.
Well the reason
we have the first debate is because we live in a system of corporate
fascism controlled by the financial Mafia. To have the alternative
debate we would need to be in some sort of society that sees to the
needs of its people. Of course if we lived in a society that seen to
the needs of its people, there never would have been the “financial
crisis” in the first place. However, the real crisis is that we
allow ourselves to be dominated by a bunch of financial parasites who
will suck everything they can from the public domain.
ann arky's home.
