Food for thought.
So you think you're an anarchist?
It is quite wrong therefore to dismiss the anarchist as a chaotic, lawless person too weak to accept the responsibilities that go with being a member of a community. A true anarchist, somebody who has made an informed choice, has to be strong enough to say "I will be responsible for myself, I will answer for my actions". Conformists on the other hand are wreak, they seek the shelter of the herd, doing what others do, even thinking what others think or at least saying in public they do.
The problem with anarchy is like most other political philosophies including Marxism, utilitarianism, socialism and Trotskyism, it look great on paper but is never going to work in reality. Therefore people like myself, while anarchist in principle must settle for being anarchistic, true liberals who argue for personal freedom even if that freedom permits people to do things, hold views or express opinions we personally do not like.
The historic anarchist movement was a grass roots workers' movement which flourished from the 1860s down to the end of the 1930s. While socialist parties like the British Labour Party had begun their political life as movements run by the workers for the workers, by the time Labour won its first General Election in Britain the party had been hijacked by upper middle class academics and professionals and they were telling the party's poorer supporters how to live their lives just as the old upper class hierarchy of the nobility and landed gentry had. The working classes wanted a political movement of their own.
ann arky's home.