OCCUPY MOVEMENT = AL QAEDA!!!!

     

     This government, like all other governments spends billions on surveillance of "terrorist organisations", but what is a terrorist organisation and who decides? The following short extract from BTYahoo News, throws up lots of questions, though in some people's minds, it clears things up.

City of London Police have sparked controversy by producing a brief in which the Occupy London movement is listed under domestic terrorism/extremism threats to City businesses.

The document was given to protesters at their “Bank of Ideas” base on Sun Street – a former site of financial corporation UBS. City police have stepped up an effort to quell the movement since they occupied the building on 18 November, with the document stating: “It is likely that activists aspire to identify other locations to occupy, especially those they identify with capitalism.
“Intelligence suggests that urban explorers are holding a discussion at the Sun Street squat. This may lead to an increase in urban exploration activity at abandoned or high profile sites in the capital.” The Occupy movement is listed alongside threats posed by the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC), Al Qaeda and Belarussian terrorists.

CONTINUE READING---.

 

         Well at least this statement makes it clear that the role of the police is not to keep the peace and law and order. To all those who laboured under this illusion it is now there in black and white on the printed paper, issued by the police themselves, their aim is to protect capitalism. Now it seems to be out in the open that you are a terrorist/extremist if you are a threat to City business. It would appear that in the eyes of this regime that we live under, peaceful protest by the citizens equates to extremism and terrorism. I thought we were told that it was the courts that would decide who was right or wrong in these matters, not the police chief. Is it the government or the police that decides who is on the list alongside Al Qaeda and FARC, or are these list made up by group of unelected secret service bosses? Or more likely a group of corporate advisers who will do everything in their power to eliminate any criticism to their greed feast.

ann arky's home.

   "EXTREMISTS" AND UNIVERSITIES. 

       Recently the Cameron/Clegg millionaire cabal have been shouting there mouths off about universities not doing enough to crack down on extremists. To most people in this country, this is interpreted as meaning violent Muslim extremists, but however that is not how it will unfold. It will encompass all “extremists” as defined by that narrow band of pro-establishment public school thugs. If you advocate radical change to society away from the profit motive and towards a sustainable, needs based society, you no doubt will come under the heading of “extremist”. We should be very vigilant when we hear those in power talking about clamping down on “extremists”. Who draws the line between acceptable view and “extremist”, how narrow should acceptable be defined?

ACCEPTABLE AND UNACCEPTABLE EXTREMISTS???

 

       The other point that is very important, is that if universities are suppose to be at the cutting edge of research in all fields, how do you do that if you exclude those views that don't fit the mainstream acceptable views of the establishment. In forbidding “extremist” views, you neuter any debate and confine it sterile ground and the future is barren. Of course for a number of years universities have been moving away from that position of, the centres of cutting edge debate and research and moving towards being factories that turn out units needed for “the economy” (big business).

       If your accepted ideas can't hold up in open debate, and to defend them you ban all those who disagree with those ideas, then I believe you are an “extremist”. Then we already know that the Cameron/Clegg millionaire cabal and their cohorts are indeed, right wing “extremists”.

 

 

 

ann arky's home.