WESTERN CORPORATISM'S HIT SQUAD.

         Here in the developed Western world most people look at NATO as a force for good. However it history dosn't back that up. Country after country has suffered from its military might. In truth it is no more than the Western corporate world's hit squad. The following is an extract from an intersting article which you can read HERE. 

         Like dominoes they are falling: Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya. Even al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was taken out in a surprise ambush by US special forces at his secret hideout inside of nuclear-armed Pakistan.

           Since its first act of aggression on the territory of a sovereign state (on February 28, 1994, NATO aircraft shot down four jets in the Bosnian War) each successive NATO operation is revealing an increasingly disturbing trend: the leaders of the condemned countries are meeting violent, even barbaric ends. Has the rule of law taken a back seat in NATO's global juggernaut?

           Compare the ‘natural’ death of Slobodan Milocevic, former President of Serbia and Yugoslavia, with that of the grisly murder of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. Shortly after the end of the Yugoslavian War, which saw a massive NATO aerial bombardment that lasted from March 24, 1999 to June 10, 1999, Milocevic was sent to The Hague to stand trial for charges of war crimes. Milocevic surprised his accusers by deciding to represent himself in the five-year trial. The case, however, abruptly ended without a verdict when the former four-term leader died of an apparent heart attack.

READ ON.

ann arky's home.

FROM BLOODLESS COUP, TO BLOODY DEATH.

         As the various groups give their views on the outcome of the NATO forced regime change in Libya, the opinions switch from Shangrila in Libya, and a peaceful world, to chaos with ethnic and religious battles, and Western oil companies working the miracle of changing Libyan oil into money in Western corporate shareholders' bank accounts. Who knows, but I think we can take it that the first is out of the question. The country's infrastructure has been decimated by NATO and marauding well armed militia, hell bent on firing off as much armaments as possible. It seemed as if the were on a bonus scheme from the Western arms producers. In most of the scenes from that poor unfortunate country, there hardly seems to a building that hasn't been multi-potholed. What homes are left to go home to? Such Western vengeance directed at a man who was responsible 42 years ago, for the bloodless overthrow of the Western puppet, King Idris, and for the nationalisation of Libyan oil. At that time Libya was a very poor country, as far as the people were concerned but no as far as the oil compnaies and their cronies were concerned. Gadaffi used that oil revenue to give Libya, food security by irrigation, free clean water pumped from under the Sahara, free education, free health care, and he kept a lid on the religious fundamentalists, who will now come to the fore. Probably his biggest crime in the eyes of the Western corporate world was the nationalising of the oil. Had he just taken power and left the oil in the hands of the Western corporate greed machine, perhaps he would still be in power and would still be feted by the West. Ah, that's capitalism for you.

ann arky's home.

HILLARY THE CALLOUS, THE ARROGANT.

        

         Hillary Clinton has called for the the man accused of the Lockerbie bombing to be returned to prison. He was released on compassionate grounds as he was dying from cancer and recent video footage shows him lying in his bed obviously near to death. Why would this so called civilised Christian woman want a dying man back in prison? Why is anyone put in prison, is it to try to reform them, so that they can again take their place in society, is it because they are a danger to society, so have to be kept locked up, or is it just to punish them? Does she think that Magraghi can be reformed while on his death bed, or does she think that a dying man on his death bed is a threat to society? Or does she just want to punish him? How do you punish a dying man?

       Not only has this woman shown utter callousness she has also shown her arrogance and let the cat out of the bag, in so much as who got rid of Gadaffi. This short clip shows her at her delighted and arrogant self, on hearing of Gadaffi's death and letting it be known who actually got rid of Gadaffi. This is also the same woman that sat in the comfort and safety of Washington, watching the assasination of Osama bin Laden. She glories in her assumed power.

ann arky's home.

WESTERN TERRORISTS!!!

        As the events unfold in Libya, the West is spouting about a bright new future for Libya. Whose Libya? Will it be the Libya of the religious fundamentalists, or perhaps the Libya of the big business corporate world, or more likely a combination of these two. After seeing the brutal murdering of Col. Gadaffi, I can't see a fair and democratic Libya working for the benefit of all Libyans, coming out of this destruction of a country. You would think that by now we would recognise the pattern of how the Western media, at the dictate of their masters the political class, demonise a leader and/or a country somehow legitimising sanctions against the ordinary people and then it isn't working, so let's go in and bomb the shit out of them. Libya, like Iraq, is a warning to all smaller countries with resources that the West want to control. The following is an extract from an article at RT.

         As some European leaders demonstrate a celebratory mood over the violent death of Colonel Gaddafi, they are no less terrorists themselves, claims international consultant and author Adrian Salbuchi.
­Salbuchi said Gaddafi’s death was undoubtedly a message for the whole world, as it is not just about Libya.
“We are seeing how Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State expressed it very clearly: ‘We came, we saw, he died,’ and then started laughing. This is a message to the world of how this new world order model actually works,” he stated. “When they decide to change the regime, they do so with the utmost violence, and it is a whole model. First they target a country by calling it a rogue state; then they support local terrorists and call them freedom fighters; then they bring death and destruction upon civilians and they call it UN sanctions. Then they spread lies and call it the International Community’s opinion expressed by the Western media. Then they invade and control the country and call it liberation and finally they steal appetizing oil and call it foreign investment and reconstruction,” Salbuchi explained.

Don't you know, wars create jobs?

At the moment Western powers are hailing a democratic future for Libya. When Saddam Hussein was captured in 2003 the US also thought it was all over – but it had only just begun. And according to Salbuchi, it is going to be the same, or even worse, for Libya.
READ THE ARTICLE.

  ann arky's home.

GADAFFI'S DEATH ANOTHER TURNING POINT???

       

       Every death from the Western war on teror is another "turning point", there has been so many that it is obvious that the West is running round in circles.

       This from STOP THE WAR COALITION.

       The killing of Muammar Gadaffi in Sirte has been marked by a round of celebration by western governments over their intervention in Libya. As with the capture of Saddam Hussein in Iraq and the killing of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, it will be described as a turning point and a further victory in the seemingly endless 'war on
terror'.

      There is little reason for the triumphalism. Nato's war on Libya was not a 'humanitarian intervention' but a war for regime change -- illegal under international law. It was about the western powers attempting to regain control of the region in the face of the Arab uprisings across the Middle East. Yet despite its overthrow of the regime in Libya imperialism faces many problems in the region.

       In Libya itself it is already clear that there are many divisions between the different elements in the new government, and not at all clear that a stable regime will emerge. Even if it does, the ordinary people of Libya will see their interests subjugated to the oil companies and other western business, backed up by Nato, which has no intention of vacating the scene.

       The consequences of the war on terror elsewhere are not outbreaks of peace and democracy but rather a spreading of the war. Afghanistan, ten years on, has just experienced its bloodiest two years of war. Iraq remains a society destroyed by war and occupation. Somalia remains war torn with Kenyan troops recently crossing the border. Pakistan suffers drone attacks which have killed thousands. The Israeli oppression of the Palestinians continues. There are threats of intervention over Syria.

        The recent alleged plot against the Saudi ambassador to Washington was blamed on sections of the Iranian government and Saudi and Israel are both urging attacks on Iran. Far from the west conquering all, it is deep in the mire of war. The gloating over Gadaffi should not become an excuse for further interventions that will only spread the carnage further.

SEE ALSO: JOHN PILGER -

With Libya, secured an American invasion of Africa is under way.

 http://bit.ly/qJ6PhP

ann arky's home.