Now as
the Libyans look at a divided country facing a humanitarian crisis we
should be asking ourselves whether the NATO carrying out of UN
resolution 1973 has been a success or not. The UN resolution was to
stop Gaddaffi using the Libyan air force and army helicopters to
attack the rebels and bomb civilian areas, in so doing prevent a
humanitarian disaster. What UN resolution 1973 did not do was
sanction regime change. It is also clear the the resolution did not
sanction an aerial campaign against the Libyan government nor the
Libyan army. The NATO force was to be a defence force for the Libyan
people, it was not meant to be an attack force for the benefit of
Libyan rebels. However as usual, the Western powers deliberately
misinterpret UN resolutions to further their own imperial designs. No
matter your opinion of the Gaddaffi regime the military campaign
carried out by NATO against Libya was illegal, thus making the the
leaders of the governments involved, mainly UK, France and Italy,
equally guilty of war crimes as the man they wished to replace,
Gaddaffi. It is not the first time that the Western imperialists have
carried out regime change by means of military action, but it usually
results in instability and/or civil war in the country they have
targeted. The result can usually be classified as a humanitarian
disaster, and from the reports coming out of Libya it would appear
that this case is no exception as report after report paints a
picture of a devastating humanitarian catastrophe. The only
conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence on the ground is that
the NATO carrying out of UN resolution 1973 has been an abysmal
failure. The main beneficiaries being the Western oil companies who
have already moved to get their slice of the action.
It is sad to think that there are still people out there who believe that during their financial crisis, the Western powers spent all that money and effort simply for the benefit of the Libyan people.
Showing posts with label Gaddaffi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gaddaffi. Show all posts
Monday 29 August 2011
Saturday 27 August 2011
THE LIBYA THE WEST HAS DESTROYED!!!
All those who are rooting for NATO in the Libyan attack should ask themselves, what they actually know about the Libya that NATO is destroying. What do you know of the type of society that was in place before the “rebels” backed up by the oil hungry Western fighting machine NATO started its onslaught, an onslaught that has totally destroy the infrastructure of that country? How did the people live? Who are these “rebels”? I bet you don't know, except what the Western imperialist media has told you. Don't you think that might be a biased view? How long will it be before the Libyan's can once again experience the free education, free health care, free clean drinking water for all, decent working conditions and a decent pension they had before the "rebels" set them free? As soon a any rebellion calls on the Western imperialist powers for military help, it has sold any legitimacy it may have held.
HEALTH AND WELFARE.
Social Welfare
A government advertisement appearing in an international publication in 1977
asserted that the Libyan social security legislation of 1973 ranked among the
most comprehensive in the world and that it protected all citizens from many
hazards associated with employment. The social security program instituted in
1957 had already provided protection superior to that available in many or most
developing countries, and in the 1980s the welfare available to Libyans included
much more than was provided under the social security law: work injury and
sickness compensation and disability, retirement, and survivors' pensions.
Workers employed by foreign firms were entitled to the same social security
benefits as workers employed by Libyan citizens.
Subsidized food, inexpensive housing, free medical care and education, and
profit-sharing were among the benefits that eased the lives of all citizens. The
government protected the employed in their jobs and subsidized the underemployed
and unemployed. In addition, there were nurseries to care for the children of
working mothers, orphanages for homeless children, and homes for the aged. The
welfare programs had reached even the oasis towns of the desert, where they
reportedly were received with considerable satisfaction. The giving of alms to
the poor remained one of the pillars of the Islamic faith, but the extent of
public welfare was such that there was increasingly less place for private
welfare. Nonetheless, the traditional Arab sense of family responsibility
remained strong, and provision for needy relatives was still a common
practice.
Medical Care
The number of physicians and surgeons in practice increased fivefold between
1965 and 1974, and large increases were registered in the number of dentists,
medical, and paramedical personnel. Further expansion and improvement followed
over the next decade in response to large budgetary outlays, as the
revolutionary regime continued to use its oil income to improve the health and
welfare of all Libyans. The number of doctors and dentists increased from 783 in
1970 to 5,450 in 1985, producing in the case of doctors a ratio of 1 per 673
citizens. These doctors were attached to a comprehensive network of health care
facilities that dispensed free medical care. The number of hospital beds
increased from 7,500 in 1970 to almost 20,000 by 1985, an improvement from 3.5
beds to 5.3 beds per 1,000 citizens. During the same years, substantial
increases were also registered in the number of clinics and health care centers.
A large proportion of medical and paramedical personnel were foreigners
brought in under contract from other Arab countries and from Eastern Europe. The
major efforts to "Libyanize" health care professionals, however, were beginning
to show results in the mid1980s . Libyan sources claimed that approximately 33
percent of all doctors were nationals in 1985, as compared with only about 6
percent a decade earlier. In the field of nursing staff and technicians, the
situation was considerably better--about 80 percent were Libyan. Schools of
nursing had been in existence since the early 1960s, and the faculties of
medicine in the universities at Tripoli and Benghazi included specialized
institutes for nurses and technicians. The first medical school was not
established until 1970, and there was no school of dentistry until 1974. By 1978
a total of nearly 500 students was enrolled in medical studies at schools in
Benghazi and Tripoli, and the dental school in Benghazi had graduated its first
class of 23 students. In addition, some students were pursuing graduate medical
studies abroad, but in the immediate future Libya was expected to continue to
rely heavily on expatriate medical personnel.
Among the major health hazards endemic in the country in the 1970s were
typhoid and paratyphoid, infectious hepatitis, leishmaniasis, rabies,
meningitis, schistosomiasis, and venereal diseases. Also reported as having high
incidence were various childhood diseases, such as whooping cough, mumps,
measles, and chicken pox. Cholera occurred intermittently and, although malaria
was regarded as having been eliminated in the 1960s, malaria suppressants were
often recommended for use in desert oasis areas.
By the early 1980s, it was claimed that most or all of these diseases were
under control. A high rate of trachoma formerly left 10 percent or more of the
population blinded or with critically impaired vision, but by the late 1970s the
disease appeared to have been brought under control. The incidence of new cases
of tuberculosis was reduced by nearly half between 1969 and 1976, and twenty-two
new centers for tuberculosis care were constructed between 1970 and 1985. By the
early 1980s, two rehabilitation centers for the handicapped had been built, one
each in Benghazi and Tripoli. These offered both medical and job-training
services and complemented the range of health care services available in the
country.
The streets of Tripoli and Benghazi were kept scrupulously clean, and
drinking water in these cities was of good quality. The government had made
significant efforts to provide safe water. In summing up accomplishments since
1970, officials listed almost 1,500 wells drilled and more than 900 reservoirs
in service in 1985, in addition to 9,000 kilometers of potable water networks
and 44 desalination plants. Sewage disposal had also received considerable
attention, twenty-eight treatment plants having been built.
LIBYAN RESITANCE TO NATO ONSLAUGHT.
In every war there are two sides, and in the Libyan conflict it is no different. Unfortunately we in the West get a picture of us, the great white peace and democracy bringers against the evil empires of the world. Though it does seem a bit of a coincidence that all the evil regimes we try to save the people from, happen to be sitting on oil, and they happen to be regimes that don't always co-operate with the great Western corporate world. The article below is from The International Action Centre, and because it differs from the Western imperialist backing media, it will clash with the view you have been fed since this illegal bombing began.
LIBYA - Resistance to US/NATO Conquest Continues
Under the most incredibly difficult conditions – including NATO bombing,
mercenary landings, Special Forces operations and the destruction of civilian
infrastructure – the heroic resistance to imperialist conquest in Libya has
continued.
All the corporate media lies claiming mass surrender, the fleeing of Libyan
leader Moammar Gadhafi, the arrest of his sons and more have turned out to be
nothing but lies and psychological warfare. After 159 days of bombing,
incredibly, the residence continues.
The continued resistance also exposes the lie of the so-called democratic
“rebel” forces – forces that have been set up by Britain, France and the U.S. to
facilitate the imperialist invasion of the oil-rich country. Meanwhile, arms
have been distributed by the Libyan government to the whole population –
something a hated dictator would never do.
As in Iraq and Afghanistan, an arrogant declaration of U.S. victory and
“mission accomplished” does not mean an end to local people's resistance, which
takes many forms. The Libyan people have heroically withstood not only half a
year of bombing, but also a hail of racist corporate media propaganda seeking to
portray the U.S.-NATO military machine, both preposterously and once again, as
great white liberators.
While resistance continues in Libya, we in the center of U.S. imperialism
must continue our resistance to the criminal war there – even as the prolonged
economic war against poor and oppressed people continues within the U.S.
An IAC-organized truth tour featuring former Congressperson Cynthia McKinney
– who traveled to Libya to be an eyewitness to the U.S.-NATO attack – has built
major opposition meetings in 21 cities across the country. At each meeting,
which was undertaken by a local coalition of forces, hundreds of anti-war and
anti-imperialist and community activists attended.
These meetings against U.S. war in Libya have been the largest series of
anti-war meetings held in years. At the same time, the IAC has been in the
streets, organizing protests across the country.
The U.S. war in Libya is a first aggressive step in the expansion of wars of
colonial conquest in Africa. It means new U.S. threats against Sudan and
Somalia. It means more belligerent targeting of other countries in Middle East,
especially Syria and Iran.
Help us continue resistance to U.S./NATO war on Libya.
Contact us at www.iacenter.org/comments 212-633-6646 www.iacenter.org
Donate to help us continue resistance to U.S./NATO War on Libya and support the expenses of the Cynthia McKinney Truth Tour at www.iacenter.org/africa/donatemckinneylibyatour/See full LIBYA TRUTH TOUR with Cynthia McKinney schedule at www.iacenter.org/africa/mckinneylibya080511/
ann arky's home.Thursday 25 August 2011
AN EMPTY COMPOUND???
Just a thought, I don't know about you but the information being reported from Tripoli doesn't seem to add up. It was being reported that there were fierce gun battles raging to take the "Compound" with strong resistance coming from those defending it, then there is the beakthrough. The "rebels" enter the "Compound" and we don't see any Gaddaffi fighters surrender or wounded or dead, where did they go? All we see is the "rebels" looting an empty place and firing their guns in the air. Was there nobody in the "Compound" defending it? Did they all just march out through the doors before the "rebels" arrived? Where did they go with all their weapons, their wound and their dead, did they leave in a convoy through the occupied streets? As usual, in the fog of war, we never get told the truth, we get the usual media spin.
Monday 22 August 2011
AFTER GADDAFFI????
STOP THE WAR COALITION22 August 2011
Email office@stopwar.org.uk
Tel: 020 7801 2768
Web: http://stopwar.org.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/STWuk
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/stopthewarcoalition
LIBYA AFTER GADAFFI: STATEMENT BY STOP THE WAR COALITION
The fall of the Gadaffi regime in Libya marks yet another turning point in what has been a truly remarkable year in the Middle East. The victory of the rebels, backed by Nato bombing in a six month campaign initiated by the British and French governments, also heralds the rehabilitation of a discredited doctrine -- that of 'humanitarian intervention' -- after the debacle of Iraq and Afghanistan.
The defeat of Gadaffi is now being used to justify military action on the grounds that it has helped the Arab revolutions. David Cameron declared outside Downing Street 22 August 2011, 'This has not been our revolution, but we can be proud that we have played our part.'
The hypocrisy of Cameron is staggering, given the role of British and other western governments in backing up dictators and despots in the region -- only halted in some places by the actions of the Arab people themselves.
The Nato intervention has not been for idealistic values. It has been about regime change, so that a leader more acceptable to western governments and business could replace Gadaffi.
Right to the end, NATO was bent on a military victory and bringing the Transitional National Council (TNC) -- the Benghazi administration -- to power in Libya by force of arms. All proposals for talks to achieve a political solution – whether from within Libya or outside - have been brushed aside.
While many Libyans may welcome the outcome, and will be glad to see the back of Gadaffi, it has a number of negative aspects.
Email office@stopwar.org.uk
Tel: 020 7801 2768
Web: http://stopwar.org.uk
Twitter: http://twitter.com/STWuk
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/stopthewarcoalition
LIBYA AFTER GADAFFI: STATEMENT BY STOP THE WAR COALITION
The fall of the Gadaffi regime in Libya marks yet another turning point in what has been a truly remarkable year in the Middle East. The victory of the rebels, backed by Nato bombing in a six month campaign initiated by the British and French governments, also heralds the rehabilitation of a discredited doctrine -- that of 'humanitarian intervention' -- after the debacle of Iraq and Afghanistan.
The defeat of Gadaffi is now being used to justify military action on the grounds that it has helped the Arab revolutions. David Cameron declared outside Downing Street 22 August 2011, 'This has not been our revolution, but we can be proud that we have played our part.'
The hypocrisy of Cameron is staggering, given the role of British and other western governments in backing up dictators and despots in the region -- only halted in some places by the actions of the Arab people themselves.
The Nato intervention has not been for idealistic values. It has been about regime change, so that a leader more acceptable to western governments and business could replace Gadaffi.
Right to the end, NATO was bent on a military victory and bringing the Transitional National Council (TNC) -- the Benghazi administration -- to power in Libya by force of arms. All proposals for talks to achieve a political solution – whether from within Libya or outside - have been brushed aside.
While many Libyans may welcome the outcome, and will be glad to see the back of Gadaffi, it has a number of negative aspects.
From the international point of view, the most significant thing is that the government of another Arab state has been changed by external force applied by the big imperial powers. There is no real suggestion that the TNC could have come to power unaided. The NATO military intervention, stretching beyond breaking point the mandate given by the United Nations, has been decisive.
This will not be the end of the story. The experience of Iraq teaches that the overthrow of a regime under such circumstances by no means signifies the end of the war. Whether those who have supported Gadaffi will meekly accept the authority of a new government imposed under such circumstances is open to question.
Whatever happens, the deep divisions within Libyan society remain. Likewise, given that the TNC is an amalgam of forces, ranging from the democratic to the Islamist to leaders who are the direct employees of western interests, it may have neither the capacity to resolve existing differences nor the ability to prevent the emergence of new ones, within its own ranks.
David Cameron spelt out the close role Britain and the other western powers will expect to have in running Libya, and in how much detail they have been planned, including ‘stabilisation experts who have been planning for this moment…for months.’
Under these circumstances, the main demand must be an end to all forms of NATO interference in Libya – not just the end of the bombing, but the withdrawal of special forces and a halt to all forms of political interference. The only solution to the crisis in Libya will have to be a Libyan solution. Recent history, from Iraq to Afghanistan, teaches that too.
But beyond that, we must recognise the danger that even a passing 'success' in Libya may embolden the US, British and French governments to believe that the idea of 'liberal interventionism', discredited after Iraq, can be revived on a broader scale. Of course, however it ends the Libyan conflict has not gone as expected and none of the leaders of the aggression have dared introduce ground troops into the war. Nevertheless, the danger of extending the intervention to Syria as part of a programme to control and suppress the 'Arab Spring' is not inconceivable and must be mobilised against.
The old rulers will not be missed if and when they depart. The decisive issues – genuinely democratic and popular regimes across the Arab world, the exclusion of great power interference in the region and justice for the Palestinian people – remain in the balance and require our solidarity.
LINDSEY GERMAN, National Convenor, Stop the War Coalition
ANDREW MURRAY, National Chair, Stop the War Coalition--
PRIORITIES--BUSINES IS BUSINESS.
Before the guns have fallen silent the West is showing its true priorities. The following report from Reuters tells you the way the West thinks. the oil giants are already on the private jets to take control of Libya's resources. This is what the blood shed was all about, what happens to the people is of little interest to the Western powers, they can rot in hell as far as the Western corporate world is concerned. Business is business!!!
MILAN (Reuters) - Libya's leading foreign oil producer, Eni of Italy led the charge back into Libya on Monday as rebels swept into the Libyan capital Tripoli hailing the end of Muammar Gaddafi's rule.
Gaddafi's fall will reopen the doors to Africa's largest oil reserves with new players such as Qatar's national oil company and trading house Vitol set to compete with established European and U.S. companies.
Shares in European companies Italy's Eni, Austria's OMV and France's Total rose by 3-5 percent despite a $2 fall in the price of oil on hopes the firms would be able to quickly re-establish output from Libya.
Italy's Foreign Minister Franco Frattini said staff from Eni had arrived to look into a restart of oil facilities in the east of the country even as fighting between government troops and the rebels continued in Tripoli in the west.
"The facilities had been made by Italians, by (oil field services group) Saipem, and therefore it is clear that Eni will play a No. 1 role in the future," Frattini told state
VICTORY ON NATO'S COAT-TAILS!!
So it loooks like the "rebels" have won in Libya? The so called "rebels" seem to be a very fundamentalist group. There has been talk of them clearing some of the towns of black Libyans, those that settled there after the slave trade, that went through that area. Also what is never mentioned is the fact that Gaddaffi spent a lot of the oil revenue on free education, free health care and bring clean water to all the towns and villages. I wonder where the oil revenue will go after he’s gone? Any ideas?? When you hear them make comments like “I have a bullet here for Gaddaffi, and I can’t wait to use it on him” doesn’t sound much like a democrat to me. I believe that Libya will end up in chaos like Iraq, with the people suffering and violent faction and tribal conflict, but the oil will be secure in Western hands, just like Iraq. It can never be said that it was the Libyan people that over threw the Gaddaffi regime, it will have been some of the most powerful military nations in the world, it was achieved by massive air power from NATO, plus NATO helicopter gunships, and military advice with NATO advisers on the ground, costing the NATO powers hundred of millions of pounds of taxpayers money, and if you believe the nations of NATO done it all for the benefit of the Libyan people, then you’ll believe anything. Every uprising is not a move to democracy, as history has told us. In this corporate capitaist world, it is usually a move by the corporate world to control resources.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)