We all know that the "Greek experiment", as the financial Mafia call it, has caused the trashing of the living standards of the ordinary people of Greece, has resulted in the vaporisation of incomes, and the disappearance of social services. This has thrown the people of Greece to fall back on their own resolve and imagination, and to come up with new ways of surviving this brutal onslaught on the fabric of their society.
They have not been idle on that front, co-operatives, self help, squats, and mutual aid schemes, have sprung up across the country, factories have been taken over by the workers, farmers have started dealing direct with the public, rather than the corporations. All this takes place in the face of state repression and police brutality, as the powers that be attempt to hold onto the old exploitative ways of organising society, the last thing they want is that people start to organise society in a way that is most beneficial to the people. Will the new ways sustain themselves, will they grow, will they set an example to the rest of Europe, or will they be viciously destroy by the heavy hand of the state and its masters the corporate world.
Extract from an interview with Antonio Cuesta Marín, author of the book “Solidarity and Self Organisation in Greece” Taken From X-pressed:
4. To what extent are these initiatives sustainable? Especially those based on solidarity, such as pharmacies, clinics…Read the full interview HERE:
With regards to economics, I think their viability depends on the skills of its members and their ability to work, along with the fact that their ethical principles create a closer proximity to local populations. The sustainability of solidarity projects has other conditional factors: the intervention on pressing problems for the neighbours is based on the collaboration and participation of many people. As far as I know, some initiatives have been modified to better suit real needs but have not disappeared. When one gets to know the level of involvement of many anonymous participants and the original proposals to provide funding to projects, then one can understand that, against all odds, they will go ahead.
5. Does the society know about them, in general? Has there been some sort of public debate on new ways of meeting these needs based on self-organisation? (I mean, by a wide audience, the average Greek).
My sense is that there are two parallel worlds running, that of institutional politics reproduced by the mainstream media, and that of the reality experienced by the citizens, which is clearly present in any initiative or social group. Of course, the corporate media have not fostered a frank and open discussion on possible alternatives or on the demands of popular movements. They have occasionally mentioned some of the projects but from a humanitarian point of view rather than claim. It is normal; the rationale of these “opinion makers” is embedded into the neoliberal system and will not facilitate any debate contrary to their interests. However, I believe that at the grassroots level there have been channels of communication opened which have helped to transfer information and calls which have worked quite effectively.
No comments:
Post a Comment